School of the Future Part 3: Administration

After taking a short hiatus from social networking due to the birth of my daughter (cutie), I return to the school of the future series with a fury. In this post I would like to discuss educational hierarchy in general and school administrations in particular. Some recent events taking place within my PLN have made this subject even more topical. Recently Beth Still put out an invitation for innovative administrators to apply for an upcoming position at her school. She also asked other bloggers in her network to cross blog her post, maximizing exposure. In a similar circumstance, Scott McLeod wrote an open letter to his school board imploring them to think about educational reform as they select new leadership. I think this is a revolution in the way administrators are selected for districts, and perhaps this will be a way administrators are selected for schools of the future.

The most important question for me is: what are the qualities we need to see in progressive administrators to insure that educational reform can move forward. How much education or experience does a person need to be an effective administrator in the 21st century? What personal qualities do we wish our leaders to possess? How can we insure that the greatest talent goes to the most needy schools?

In my experience an administrator with vision can be transformative, and a leader without vision can be disruptive so I will begin the discussion by answering my own questions. Currently administrators need to have quite a bit of schooling to be qualified in my state, but having spent time in a classroom is not a prerequisite. Personally I wouldn’t mind if the educational requirements were softened in favor of a minimum years of teaching requirement. I think that school administrators should be required to spend at least five years teaching. Hopefully this would give some administrators more perspective, both in terms of the students and the teachers. Administrators should be open minded and forward thinking when it comes to new technologies. Administrators need to continually challenge the teachers in their districts to reject the status quo, but they should do so in a way that teachers feel safe. Administrators need to have the courage to fix the problems that exist in their schools, but act with a long-term, deliberate plan that contains measurable goals.

If you were on the committee choosing your school’s next administrator, what would be non-negotiable?

Advertisements
Tagged , , ,

2 thoughts on “School of the Future Part 3: Administration

  1. John Weidner, Sr. says:

    Chris,

    Please remember that it is not just the Superintendent or the Principals in the leadership role. You have elected officials who must be put into the mix. They are THE final say. If they don’t get it, you will not see the changes that you desire.

    Your administrative team can do a bang up job of selling these ideas, but if the Board wants to balk on the decisions that will take the district in new directions, you’re sunk.

  2. ktenkely says:

    Congratulations on the birth of your daughter!!
    I agree, those in educational administration should have a requirement that they have been a teacher. It is hard to lead a school if you don’t have a clear vision of how it all works. I would also say that administrators should be required to spend time in each classroom in their schools. If they aren’t in the classroom, it is hard to make decisions that will affect those classrooms.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: